Friday, September 28, 2018

Assignment 9A - Testing the Hypothesis Part 2




Who:

Trying to identify who would benefit from my opportunity, and ultimate solution, was a bit more difficult than originally anticipated. This is because everyone could benefit from safer roads if drivers were not distracted by their smart devices, regardless if they drive or not, and regardless if they do drive whether they use a smart device while doing so or not. It took me awhile to realize that not everyone would actually be an ultimate consumer of my solution or product. Someone who is a potential customer would need to be a driver AND be a smart device user (and my boundary definition has been adjusted as a result of this exercise).

Therefore, while I could not find someone who did not drive, nor could I find someone who did not own a smart device, I could interview people who could come into contact with drivers while they themselves were not driving (despite any benefit from safer driving conditions as a result of my product). Interviews therefore were from the context of a non-driving activity in the proximity of roads. This included potential pedestrians, walkers/joggers/runners, bicyclists, skateboarders, etc.



What:

Poor driving is not solely a result of smart device usage, and there are other distractors that contribute to accidents and fatalities. Radios, rowdy kids in the back seat, or daydreaming are all examples of this. Additionally, for my non-driving population stated in the “who” section, there could also be reasons they are struck by vehicles or involved in accidents. Wearing non-reflective, dark clothing at night, j-walking, and not following the rules of the road while sharing the road with vehicles could also result in incidents.



Why:

The underlying cause of these interviewees needs is not necessarily different in terms of them both being related to poor choices, distractions, or law violations. The contributing reasons to the incidents for this population is the only thing that is different, with smart device using drivers only being one of these reasons.



                     Inside the boundary                                              Outside the boundary
Who:            Drivers who own smart devices                           Everyone else

What:           Smart device use while driving is causing           All other accidents or

                     accidents and fatalities                                         fatalities not caused by smart

                                                                                                  device use.

Why:            Increased smart device users                               Inability to control the

                     Increased complexity of apps                              actions of others

                     Failure of drivers to self-regulate

                     Lack of needed regulation

                     Lack of knowledge of existing regulation                                                                                                     
                                               

Assignment 10A - Elevator Pitch No.1

https://youtu.be/W_EnKuKKmo8

Friday, September 21, 2018

Assignment 8A - Solving the Problem



The Opportunity:

The opportunity I have identified is the problem of increasing number of vehicle related accidents, injuries, and fatalities due to drivers being distracted by their smart phone devices. Current laws do not seem to be solving the issue. While this may be in part due to lack of driver awareness of such laws aimed at preventing device use while driving, it is clear that those familiar with such laws still fail to adhere to them due to their own inability to self-regulate their behavior. And, those law-abiding drivers who do not use their devices while driving, or those simply responsible enough not to do so, are still at the mercy of the other drivers on the road who refuse to put their smart device down. And, this can be at their own peril, literally.



Proposed Product/Solution:

My proposed solution is to implement technological barriers that forcibly prevent drivers from using their smart device when driving. The technology will physically prevent a driver from interacting with their device, or apps on their device, even if they want to while their vehicle is in operation.

Technologies to be a combination of the following:

· Smart device manufacturers develop hardware that can identify when vehicles are in operation, perhaps with motion detecting mechanics.

· Operating system and/or application/software developers can incorporate into programs “app killers”.

· Car manufacturers to develop device interface technology that work with smart device software to disable user apps while vehicle is in operation. If the car is on, the smart device is “off”.

This technology will require both incentivized and mandated support:

· Incentivized to include things like parental controls on the apps, and insurance company premium incentives for use.

· Mandated application will require lobbying, additional legislation, and law enforcement.



Assignment 7A - Testing the Hypothesis, Part 1



Opportunity: Prevent the use of smart phone devices while driving.

· The who: All drivers of moving vehicles.

· The what: This distraction is causing unsafe conditions on the roadways resulting in property damage, accidents, injury, and death.

· The why: Increased usage of smart phone devices is growing exponentially. This, coupled with driver unwillingness or inability to self-regulate their device usage while driving, shows a correlation of increasing numbers of traffic related accidents and fatalities.



Testing the who: Are there others that have this need?

· Pedestrians.

· Non-motorized vehicle operators (i.e. bicycles, skateboards).

· Drivers of other vehicles.

· Insurance companies.

· Law enforcement.

· Non-driving vehicle passengers (including personal vehicles and public transport).

Testing the what: What are the boundaries of the need?

· Drivers of vehicles who are not using a smart device (i.e. victims)

Testing the why:

· Ineffective existing regulations/laws are not adequately addressing the issue.

· Poor communication of current laws, so citizens do not comply out of ignorance.

· Increasing app complexity requires more dedicated attention and interface from user.

· Inability for people to understand or accept the potential consequences of personal actions.



Interview summary:

All interviewees overwhelmingly agree that there is an issue that current efforts, or lack of existing deterrents, are not solving. They all site concerns with their own safety due to negligence of other drivers, and some admit they lack the self-restraint to prevent the creation of potential safety concerns to themselves and others through their own device use while driving. Multiple personal stories of witnessing near misses or actual incidents, being involved in actual incidents, and having friend and family fatalities due to this issue were given.



Key learnings:

While the interviews revealed a unanimous agreement that further effort is needed to curb smart device use while behind the wheel, there was substantial resistance to having device interaction limitations forced on them (through technological or other barriers). This includes those that admit they cannot self-regulate their device usage while driving. Any self-regulated solutions will need to come with substantial incentives for people to opt in and use. Any mandated or imposed solutions may require legislation for mandatory compliance.

Wednesday, September 12, 2018

Assignment 6A - Identifying Opportunities in Economic & Regulatory Trends



Economic trend: Available number of jobs in US is exceeding the number of job seekers.

a) This opportunity was found in the Wall Street Journal in an article titled “U.S. News: Employers Feel Pinch Of Robust Job Market”: https://search-proquest-com.lp.hscl.ufl.edu/docview/2102241353/E1D3627E478D4F7BPQ/11?accountid=10920

b) The fact that those underemployed or those seeking employment is lower than available jobs leads me to believe there is an opportunity. Defining the multiple reasons for various labor shortages, then identifying unique solutions for each, could be a lucrative opportunity for companies who are desperate to fill their job openings. It is also an opportunity for those currently employed to obtain new opportunities at higher compensation.

c) HR teams that are looking to hire, looking for ways to expedite their screening and hiring processes, would likely be a customer. Perhaps companies in need of consultants or technology/automation solutions to replace workers to offset their understaffed labor situation would be customers. Also, those looking to offer technical training for those jobs that are tough to fill due to untrained labor. Obviously, job seekers who are qualified for an in demand job.

d) This opportunity is likely difficult to exploit because, if it were an easy one-solve for all potential hiring companies, it would already be solved. However, niche opportunities are likely countless and can be solved with focused effort. Difficultly at accessing jobs by the job seeker is dependent on their skillset.

e) Part of the article talked about the fact that the labor shortages will likely drive up wages, perhaps higher than some companies can afford to pay. That reminded me of the “Fight for $15”, and how McDonald’s responded by replacing workers /cashiers with order taking technology. I am also a labor and training integration manager at my current job, and I am well aware of the growing risk at being able to fill our vacancies given the unemployment rate and the growing economy. We are starting to strategize at work how we can either become more efficient with our labor force if we will be unable to grow it, as well as how we incentivize available workers to choose our company for employment over other companies.



Economic trend: Japanese company profits are soaring, but shares are not due to disinterest from foreign investors.

a) This opportunity was found in the Wall Street Journal in an article titled “Profits Soar in Japan, but Shares Don’t”: https://search-proquest-com.lp.hscl.ufl.edu/docview/2101212278/DA5CE194840A4331PQ/34?accountid=10920

b) If Japanese companies are showing increased profit and profit margins, a delayed response in the markets may be an opportunity to invest now for possible delayed gains once the markets start to reflect company performance.

c) The most likely customer would be individual investors or money management firms.

d) This opportunity is pretty easy to exploit, but the risk may be a little higher than other opportunities because the potential gains come from actualization of anticipated response from the Japanese stock markets.

e) I don’t think this opportunity is difficult for the average person to see, if they are engaged in some sort of investment or saving strategy. I think it is harder for some people to “see” because of their assessment of risk/opportunity, or because their money is managed by firms.



Regulatory changes: California governor signs into law that 100% of the state’s electricity will need to be generated by renewable sources by 2045.

a) This opportunity was found in the Wall Street Journal in an article titled “California’s Carbon Exorcism”: https://search-proquest-com.lp.hscl.ufl.edu/docview/2102241317/E1D3627E478D4F7BPQ/34?accountid=10920

b) This article is screaming opportunity! If ALL electric energy use will need to be from renewables, residents will be required to own equipment to produce their own renewable energy, or purchase it for use.

c) The customers for the opportunity will literally be every resident, business owner, and government facility in the state.

d) This opportunity is difficult to exploit because renewables are very costly to run, electricity storage technology is poor, and the economy is currently built on energy reliance which requires more traditional energy sources to convert to electricity.

e) I am from California, so I am not surprised to see something like this. However, this is one that I do not believe would be difficult for a lot of people to identify as an opportunity. The new law will require this to be in place in less than 30 years, and the infrastructure and technology are simply not in existence yet. Someone needs to make it happen!





Regulatory changes: EPA rules weaken on methane for oil and gas companies.

a) This opportunity was found in the Wall Street Journal in an article titled “U.S. News: EPA Plan Weakens Rules on Methane”: https://search-proquest-com.lp.hscl.ufl.edu/docview/2102241417/E1D3627E478D4F7BPQ/12?accountid=10920

b) This information suggests there is an opportunity because reduced regulation could lead to reduced costs to companies in the industry, leading to cash flows redirected to growth, R&D, or other investments, savings passed to consumers, the addition of other entrants into the industry, or other energy providers that look to capitalize on social responsibility platforms.

c) The likely customers are current oil and gas companies, new industry entrants, lobbyists, gas and oil consumers (B2C and B2B) and how cheap energy can lead to growth and increased production, other energy option providers.

d) For existing companies and customers, it is likely fairly easy to exploit because reduced regulation allows for reduced costs immediately. It may be more difficult for new entrants or alternative energy companies to startup businesses, or reposition their marketing strategies to capitalize on the change. Existing companies could also choose to compete and capitalize on a socially responsible platform by keeping the more stringent rules in place for their company, or even making them more stringent, while other oil and gas companies ease their rules with the EPA update.

e) I think I see this opportunity because so many are focused on being angry about what they believe will be adverse environmental impacts from the easing of this Obama era EPA rule. I’ve long held that it is vitally important to be environmentally responsible, but not at the cost of bringing the U.S. economy to a halt. Cheaper energy, as a result of regulation change, has the opportunity to bring growth and increased production, and smart, responsible business owners can be environmentally responsible too. But, the politics of it doesn’t seem to see it that way and people get blinded by the environmental fight.

Assignment 5A - Identifying Local Opportunities


· Title: “High waters might pose some big problems - Hidden docks, wakes risk to boaters, property” by Stephan Hudak of the Orlando Sentinel.

o Link: https://infoweb-newsbank-com.lp.hscl.ufl.edu/apps/news/document-view?p=WORLDNEWS&t=pubname%3AORLB%21Orlando%2BSentinel%252C%2BThe%2B%2528FL%2529/year%3A2018%212018/mody%3A0912%21September%2B12&f=advanced&action=browse&format=text&docref=news/16E63B57E914C4F8

o Summary: In this article from the September 12, 2018 issue, the author states that higher than normal annual rainfall has occurred in the Orlando area causing the water levels in lakes to rise. (This issue also occurs when hurricanes or large storms bring higher than normal rainfall.) The author describes two main issues caused as a result, which are difficult for local governments to address due to their limited authority on waterways.

o Problem: The first issue resulting from this is that docks become submerged under the water, and are no longer visible to boaters and jet skiers. This is resulting in damage to water vehicles, and the docks, when vehicles impact these docks. The second issue is the water level is causing the shoreline of the lakes to creep up closer to people’s homes. Wakes from boaters are causing waves of water to push up onto yards, and even into homes, causing personal property damage.

o Who: This issue has property damage implications for: property owners on the shoreline, including homes, yards, and docks. Also boat owners, jet ski owners, and water recreation rental companies. There are also personal injury implications for: those engaged in water recreation, those living on the shore, those walking the shore, those swimming in the lake.

· Title: “Orlando prepares environment-plan update - Rain barrels may return; plastic bags may not” by Ryan Gillespie of the Orlando Sentinel.

o Link: https://infoweb-newsbank-com.lp.hscl.ufl.edu/apps/news/document-view?p=WORLDNEWS&t=pubname%3AORLB%21Orlando%2BSentinel%252C%2BThe%2B%2528FL%2529/year%3A2018%212018/mody%3A0912%21September%2B12&f=advanced&action=browse&format=text&docref=news/16E63B5842EB3CF8

o Summary: In this article from the September 12, 2018 issue, the author summarizes the results of environmental regulation impacts stemming from downtown Orlando resident complains on growing pollution concerns.

o Problem: There is the possibility that officials may present a policy banning Styrofoam containers, commonly used for takeout food and leftovers, as well as plastic bag and straw bans for vendors who do business at city events and facilities. The complaint is that these items end up floating in waterways and in storm drains. There are resulting cost of sale implications to businesses, as well as impacts to customer services offered and customer convenience.

o Who: Business owners in Orlando, vendors at city events and facilities, customers who want to take leftovers home after eating at a restaurant, customers at city events, downtown residents, tourists, water wildlife.

· Title: “Orlando prepares environment-plan update - Rain barrels may return; plastic bags may not” by Ryan Gillespie of the Orlando Sentinel.

o Link: https://infoweb-newsbank-com.lp.hscl.ufl.edu/apps/news/document-view?p=WORLDNEWS&t=pubname%3AORLB%21Orlando%2BSentinel%252C%2BThe%2B%2528FL%2529/year%3A2018%212018/mody%3A0912%21September%2B12&f=advanced&action=browse&format=text&docref=news/16E63B5842EB3CF8

o Summary: In this article from the September 12, 2018 issue, the author summarizes the results of environmental regulation impacts stemming from downtown Orlando resident complains on growing pollution concerns.

o Problem: Water from rain gutters contribute to excess storm water runoff, causing erosion and pollution. In the past, rain barrels had been offered by the city to residents in order to catch rain runoff, and the local government is again considering offering this. However, the previous program ended due to lack of funding.

o Who: Residents and business property owners due to erosion damage, city residents due to pollution in shared waterways and public drainage systems, pets of residents in high runoff areas, local wildlife, especially fish/turtles in waterways, tourists.

· Title: “Spectrum cable, internet outage frustrates Central Florida customers” by Lisa Maria Garza of the Orlando Sentinel.

o Link: https://infoweb-newsbank-com.lp.hscl.ufl.edu/apps/news/document-view?p=WORLDNEWS&t=pubname%3AORLB%21Orlando%2BSentinel%252C%2BThe%2B%2528FL%2529/year%3A2018%212018/mody%3A0911%21September%2B11&f=advanced&action=browse&format=text&docref=news/16E5E381366965C8

o Summary: In this article from the September 11, 2018 issue, the author sites widespread internet and cable outages from the major service provider in the area.

o Problem: The article states that Spectrum claims the outages were a result of impacts from severe storms in the area. The service interruptions began on Sunday September 9, and continued into Monday. The company was unable to provide an estimate as to when service would be restored to affected customers, which ranged from residents upset to be missing Sunday night football, to businesses like public schools that had their operations impacted.

o Who: Residents, businesses, students, or anyone relying on cable or internet services for leisure, business operations, or study.

· Title: “Charters struggling to pay required resource officers” by Leslie Postal of the Orlando Sentinel.

o Link: https://infoweb-newsbank-com.lp.hscl.ufl.edu/apps/news/document-view?p=WORLDNEWS&t=pubname%3AORLB%21Orlando%2BSentinel%252C%2BThe%2B%2528FL%2529/year%3A2018%212018/mody%3A0909%21September%2B09&f=advanced&action=browse&format=text&docref=news/16E53CB435085310

o Summary: In this article from the September 9, 2018 issue, the author describes the adverse financial impacts of new school security legislation on two Winter Garden, Fl. Charter schools in the wake of the Parkland mass shooting.

o Problem: The new legislation requires each school to have an officer or armed “guardian” assigned to each school campus. It will come at an annual cost of $81,000, when the two schools only receive a combined $35,413 from the state to pay for it. The schools need to make up the difference to meet this legal obligation and, to do so, must dip into other funding at the expense of the students and/or programs. It is especially difficult for smaller schools like these two charters, who already receive less funding than larger campuses. This year, the technology budgets will suffer, and the students will forego additional computer resources.

o Who: Officers, school faculty, students, parents, residents in the school vicinity.

· Title: “Blood-sucking 'kissing bugs' heading to Florida” by Johnny Diaz of the Orlando Sentinel.

o Link: https://infoweb-newsbank-com.lp.hscl.ufl.edu/apps/news/document-view?p=WORLDNEWS&t=pubname%3AORLB%21Orlando%2BSentinel%252C%2BThe%2B%2528FL%2529/year%3A2018%212018/mody%3A0828%21August%2B28&f=advanced&action=browse&format=text&docref=news/16E145ECF0B934A0

o Summary: In this article from the August 28, 2018 issue, the author warns of a parasite carrying insect that is migrating to the southern United States, including Florida.

o Problem: This blood-sucking insect, nicknamed “kissing bugs” because they bite and suck blood from the faces of people, carry parasites they pass to those they bite. These parasites can cause Chagas disease, which can lead to heart disease, as well as a range of other symptoms. There are currently no synthetic chemicals approved to be used against these insects, according to the CDC.

o Who: Any resident or tourist to Florida, pets.

Friday, September 7, 2018

Assignment 4A - Forming An Opportunity Belief

I believe that there is a need for eliminating smart phone use while driving. Yes, we now have laws that state it is illegal to use a smart device while driving. Yes, we have social pressures in place, such as “Don’t text and drive” advertisements on every other billboard. But, the current efforts that rely on driver self-regulation are not working. An article from Bloomberg.com, Smartphones Are Killing Americans But Nobody’s Counting, cites that suddenly in 2016 and 2017, US traffic fatalities surged by 14.4%. With no other obvious indicators for the surge, the article correlates this to the increase in smartphone use, as well as the increasing complexity of apps being used on the devices that require more focus and attention from the user. And, according to statista.com, the number of smartphone users in the US is on the rise, and therefore this issue is likely to also continue to grow. In 2010, the number of smartphone users was 62.2 million. In 2016 the number had jumped to 208.61. in 2022, the number is estimated to be 270.66 million.


Interaction No. 1: Male, mid 40’s, single

· Do you use your smartphone while driving? Why/why not? If you do, do you feel that you focus less on the road than before you had a smart device?

o “Yes, I do. I have ADD with my phone. I’m always texting, on social media, looking up stuff on the internet based on what I hear on the radio. I watch YouTube while driving. I know I have to stop this because I’m going to end up killing someone. I 100% am less focused on the road than before I had my smartphone, no doubt about that.”

· Do you see other drivers using their smartphones while they are driving? What do you observe? What do you think when you see this?

o “Yes, all of the time. I judge them. They are NOT safe! I think ‘Why are they doing that?!’ They will be sitting at a light after it turns green, and they don’t go. I honk and yell at them ‘Get off your phone!!’ Yes, I know. I have no room to talk.”

· Do you think smartphones are contributing to increased frequency of accidents and traffic related fatalities?

o “Yes. I was just recently in an accident where a guy hit me. I know he was on his phone even though he wouldn’t admit it. You also see people veer and swerve all over the road and, when you pass them, they are on their phones.”

· Do you believe the current laws and social pressures are having an effect on this problem?

o “No. People feel entitled, think they will get out of it if caught, or think it won’t happen to them. Younger people don’t understand consequences, so they continue to do it. The AT&T pledge isn’t doing anything. And an ‘I don’t text and drive’ sticker on my car won’t do it.”

· If there was a way to forcibly prevent drivers from using their smartphone while driving (think device disablement), including yourself and outside emergency situations of course, would you think this would be a good thing?

o “Yes, it would be good because it would make drivers safer because they couldn’t use their smartphone. We have the driving apps now, to help curb phone use while driving, and I won’t use it. I’m weak. It’s an addiction. (Pulls out phone and looks at it, checks app usage.) I’ve used my phone almost 5 hours just today. (It was 3:45PM.) I’ve been on social media over 30 hours in the past 7 days. I’d be for it as long as whatever disables the device can distinguish between a driver and a passenger.”



Interaction No. 2: Male, ~30, married with twin infants

· Do you use your smartphone while driving? Why/why not? If you do, do you feel that you focus less on the road than before you had a smart device?

o “I have my smartphone on a magnet connected to my AC vent. I don’t text and drive; that’s very unsafe. I will use Siri for voice-to-text, though. I used to text and drive but realized that was stupid, so I don’t do it anymore. I mostly use my device for playing music. I probably am more distracted now with a smartphone than before, although I used to have CDs instead that would distract me.”

· Do you see other drivers using their smartphones while they are driving? What do you observe? What do you think when you see this?

o “Yes, at traffic lights. I get so angry! Nobody moves at a green light! They are all on their phones! I constantly see people drive off the road and swerve. I also see them drive slower when they are texting, as if that makes it safer.”

· Do you think smartphones are contributing to increased frequency of accidents and traffic related fatalities?

o “Yes. People are swerving off the road, and they come into my lane while on their phones. It’s scary worse than drunk drivers.”

· Do you believe the current laws and social pressures are having an effect on this problem?

o “In different places. In New York, a cop will pull you over if they even see you look at your phone. Here, the cops do nothing. I’m not even sure if a Florida law exists.”

· If there was a way to forcibly prevent drivers from using their smartphone while driving (think device disablement), including yourself and outside emergency situations of course, would you think this would be a good thing?

o “I want people to stop doing it on their own instead of forcibly doing it. What if you are a passenger and want to use the phone? I think some would think it’s a good idea based on personal experience, say if their child was killed in a related accident. Actually, if a passenger could still use the phone, then I think locking out a driver from using it would be a good idea.”



Interaction No. 3: Female, ~40, single

· Do you use your smartphone while driving? Why/why not? If you do, do you feel that you focus less on the road than before you had a smart device?

o “No. I will sit in the parking lot for 20 minutes to take care of whatever I need to take care of on my phone before starting to drive. When I was young, my dad was a ‘body scraper’. I was exposed to the consequences of behaviors like this early in life. I also had a friend in North Carolina who was driving and posting on Facebook what a great day she had, and was killed in an accident while posting that message.”

· Do you see other drivers using their smartphones while they are driving? What do you observe? What do you think when you see this?

o “Yes! I see them in my rearview mirror, on the side of me, in front of me; I honk! I’m selfish cause I want to live! I don’t want them to come into my lane, or hurt me, or hurt themselves. We can avoid it.”

· Do you think smartphones are contributing to increased frequency of accidents and traffic related fatalities?

o “Absolutely! It’s unfortunate. And we now have Apple watches which makes it worse. We feel we always need to be connected. I can hear my phone go off in the back seat and I wonder who it is, but I don’t look. It’s not worth it.”

· Do you believe the current laws and social pressures are having an effect on this problem?

o “I don’t know what the actual laws are. I know in some states it’s legal, and in some it’s not, and some require hands-free. There used to be lots of tv commercials and radio spots, but the seriousness and frequency of the messages is fading. I don’t think either are very effective. It’s the human element. Nobody thinks it will happen to them.”

· If there was a way to forcibly prevent drivers from using their smartphone while driving (think device disablement), including yourself and outside emergency situations of course, would you think this would be a good thing?

o “No. It’s too much government control. You, your family, or those you affect by an incident may have to face the consequences, but that is just too much control. I know it would probably do a lot of good, but it is a slippery slope and it crosses the line. What will they monitor or control next?”


Reflection:

The interactions confirmed most of what I suspected. All responses acknowledge there is a dire problem that current efforts are not solving. There is unanimous agreement that most people cannot self-regulate, and the consequences have life and death implications. All recognize that other drivers lack awareness of their surroundings, and there is concern for personal well-being and safety. Most seem to not be aware of existing laws that prohibit smart device use while driving. Clearly, the main indicator of responsible behavior while behind the wheel is from those that have personally, or known of others, that have suffered consequences. There is a concern that regulation could impede on personal freedom.



Summary:

Based on my initial belief, and reinforcement from my interactions, this opportunity is real and exists. There may, however, be an intermediate step before going to full technological enforcement, or at least an effort that can be explored while the opportunity is developed. The lack of understanding of current law was apparent and, perhaps with focused campaigns to inform the public, increased compliance with laws will occur once the public is aware. Entrepreneurs should definitely adapt the opportunity to customer feedback because, after all, customers will only consume if it satisfies their needs. Therefore, adaptation of this opportunity to have the technology distinguish between a driver and passenger would be critical in opportunity development.

Thursday, September 6, 2018

Assignment 3A - Your Entrepreneurship Story

My entrepreneurship story started back in high school when our class was given group projects, an assignment that required us to start and manage a new business from the ground up. Our class was divided into teams, and I was selected to be the leader. Each team was tasked with coming up with an idea for a new product, from idea conception, to delivery to the ultimate consumer. The assignment included making a prototype of the item, deciding on pricing, marketing, advertising, and selecting distribution channels. We even had to produce a video commercial to be shown to the entire class!

I am proud, and maybe slightly embarrassed to admit, that I was the one in my group that came up with the idea for our new invention. It was “The Pillow Pan”! The Pillow Pan was a solution for those that drool at night while asleep. People would no longer have to lay on those uncomfortable wet spots when the bedding absorbed the liquid, or have those unsightly drool stains ruin sheets, pillow cases, and pillows. The Pillow Pan was similar to a traditional pillow, but came with a built-in drool-capturing reservoir. The reservoir could easily be removed and emptied in the morning, eliminating overnight sleep discomfort, as well as the unsightly damage that drool previously caused to bedding. Our teacher was not necessarily convinced there would be a market for our invention, but could not deny our ingenuity after identifying a problem that a large majority of the population has experienced, and proposed a solution.

                                                      (image taken from sidesleeper.net)

Enrollment in ENT 3003 Principles of Entrepreneurship was not required for my degree in Business Administration, but an available elective. I chose to take the class because of what I am currently experiencing at my place of employment. The company I work for is going through a cultural transformation. We are shifting from a system of shared responsibility to one of direct accountability. One of the job titles in operations was even changed to “Proprietor”, to help reinforce the fact that the Proprietor for an operation is indeed the “owner” of it. Part of this culture shift toward business ownership is the encouragement of entrepreneurial thinking and action. Or, I suppose since we are company employees, intrapreneurial thinking and action.

I believe that I already am well down the path of thinking like an entrepreneur, identifying problems to be solved and working toward resolutions, at least at work. My expectation is that this class sharpens my skills, adds formal thinking and processes for more effective application of techniques, and ultimately makes me more productive and valuable in my workplace.

Wednesday, September 5, 2018

Assignment 2A - Bug List



1. The Bug: The charge port for the rechargeable computer mouse designed by Apple is located on the bottom of the mouse, where the device makes contact with a surface when in use, making the mouse unusable when charging.

WHY it exists: The port is needed for charging so the device can operate, because Apple chose to use rechargeable batteries instead of replaceable ones. The location of the port is possibly due to bad design.

2. The Bug: Ice produced by the automatic ice maker in the freezer melts together.

WHY it exists: The design anticipated ice consumption to occur more quickly. Perhaps the freezer defrost cycle inadvertently melts the ice cubes together.

3. The Bug: Travel size toiletry containers leak when taken on airplanes.

WHY it exists: The travel containers may be produced for ALL travel, not exclusively airline travel. Perhaps the container seals are not designed to withstand changes in air pressure.

4. The Bug: The grocery store has only high-priced organic produce in stock, no regular produce.

WHY it exists: Organics are more expensive, and likely are less appealing to price sensitive consumers. Consumers may still be in the adoption phase of organic produce.

5. The Bug: Fridge magnets that cannot hold any additional weight; you cannot use them to affix lists, pictures, etc. on your fridge because they fall off without full fridge contact.

WHY it exists: Perhaps the magnet was designed for multiple surfaces, including things like cars. The magnet may not have adequate “stick” based on the magnetic properties of the surface the magnet is stuck to, not the magnet itself.

6. The Bug: Gym members that do not rerack their weights.

WHY it exists: People are lazy. Gym management does not create or enforce policies with consequences for not doing so.

7. The Bug: Bagging area weight sensors at self-checkouts that are too sensitive, locking up the register and requiring an associate to assist.

WHY it exists: Shopper “operator error” from not using the equipment correctly; its not the equipment, it’s the user. The technology is too sensitive or not set up correctly.

8. The Bug: People who do not use a turn signal when you are yielding to oncoming traffic, and you wait unnecessarily.

WHY it exists: People are lazy, or are not considering other drivers. People unfamiliar with traffic laws despite the license they’ve obtained to drive.

9. The Bug: Traffic light signal cycles not timed to appropriate traffic flow and volume causing extreme delays.

WHY it exists: Traffic patterns have changed and the technology has not been updated to reflect peak times and traffic flow. Technology could also not be functioning properly.

10. The Bug: Pre-packed produce that prevents you from selecting individual fruit and vegetable items based on your own assessment of quality, as well as quantity.

WHY it exists: Grocery stores try and maximize sales by having you buy more than you need. Store may be attempting to sell through entire inventory by not having shoppers filter out and leave the least desirable items.

11. The Bug: Pump soap/body wash dispensers that do not fully dispense all product.

WHY it exists: This dispense option may be more preferable to other squeeze or pressurized options due to convenience of use and environmental impacts. The intent may be to have consumers purchase replacements sooner because not all product can always be dispensed and used and it will therefore not last as long.

12. The Bug: Items (mostly towels) get twisted and wrapped up in sheets while in the dryer, preventing them from fully drying during the cycle.

WHY it exists: The towels are heavier than sheets, and can act as a weight that twists the sheets as they tumble in the dryer. The “mattress hugger” sheet already has corner pockets that make this bug more likely to occur.

13. The Bug: Tijuana Flats makes you sign your credit card receipt for a meal that is only a few dollars.

WHY it exists: They are soliciting tips from credit purchases. They could be trying to limit as much liability for fraudulent charges.

14. The Bug: Public bathrooms that offer only electric hand dryers, no towel options for drying faces.

WHY it exists: Companies are trying to “go green” and eliminate paper waste. Electric dryer costs are likely lower than OE costs to maintain towels.

15. The Bug: Clorox style toilet tank tablets that are supposed to clean the toilet with every flush, but the bleach dissolves your rubber seals.

WHY it exists: The toilet may be flushed less frequently than the recommended “at least once per day”. Replacement toilet parts may not be manufactured to handle these bleach tabs.

16. The Bug: Lines painted on roadways/walkways that are supposed to increase pedestrian safety, but the painted surfaces become slip hazards when wet.

WHY it exists: Lines were painted with only one safety issue in mind to solve. Paint lacks anti-slip additive.

17. The Bug: Public restroom sinks with water pressure that is so high, splashes end up all over the front of your pants when the water hits your hands when you go to wash them.

WHY it exists: It could be that water pressure is too high, or the counter height is not ideal. The wrong aerator could also be attached to the end of the faucet.

18. The Bug: The cord I step on when running my vacuum back and forth over the carpet causing the vacuum to stop forward momentum unexpectedly due to loss of free movement, or causing me to almost trip.

WHY it exists: Perhaps this is due to poor vacuum design and where the cord is attached to the vacuum. It could be that I am not moving the cord out of the way, which seems odd because I feel like I am.

19. The Bug: The complete inability to trim my cat’s claws by myself. I need a second person; one to hold the cat, one to cut the claws.

WHY it exists: Perhaps my cats just hate getting their claws trimmed, and get squirmy. Existing trimming tools are not hands-free so you can use both hands to restrain the cat.

20. The Bug: People who drench themselves in perfume or cologne.

WHY it exists: People may do it intentionally because they want to have that strong of a smell. Maybe different people have different levels of sensitivity to smell.

Reflection:

In my professional life, it is very easy to find broken processes or opportunities within my organization that “bug me”, and I take action to implement operational improvements. I want to be more efficient and effective at work, and my bosses expect it of me. In my personal life, however, I am very easy going. I do not like to get worked up about things that I cannot change or influence, so I tend to let bothersome things roll off my back. Especially because we have enough headaches at work we have to solve! Therefore, I found this exercise to be extremely challenging, and it took over a week to complete a full list of twenty bugs. As expected, as I review the list, every item is something that is outside my control. Unless, of course, I took entrepreneurial action!